Mağdur Psikoduygusal Manipülasyon Ölçeği

EFA was employed to examine the dimensional structure of the Turkish VGQ. Prior to extraction, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin index of .955 indicated excellent data suitability for this analytic approach. Bartlett’s test of sphericity was also highly significant, χ²(91) = 4090.499, p < .001, verifying that the correlation matrix deviated substantially from an identity matrix and was therefore appropriate for factor extraction. CFA was subsequently applied to test the two-factor structure that emerged from EFA. The baseline model yielded the following goodness-of-fit indices: χ²/df = 4.631, CFI = .932, GFI = .883, IFI = .932, RFI = .898, TLI = .919, RMSEA = .078, SRMR = .049, with all standardized factor loadings between .67 and .88. Given that GFI and RFI were marginally below .90, a theoretically justifiable modification was introduced by allowing the error terms of items 8 and 11 to covary. The revised model (illustrated in Figure 1) exhibited satisfactory fit across all indices: χ²/df = 3.97, CFI = .94, GFI = .90, IFI = .94, RFI = .91, TLI = .93, and SRMR = .046.

EFA was employed to examine the dimensional structure of the Turkish VGQ. Prior to extraction, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin index of .955 indicated excellent data suitability for this analytic approach. Bartlett’s test of sphericity was also highly significant, χ²(91) = 4090.499, p < .001, verifying that the correlation matrix deviated substantially from an identity matrix and was therefore appropriate for factor extraction. CFA was subsequently applied to test the two-factor structure that emerged from EFA. The baseline model yielded the following goodness-of-fit indices: χ²/df = 4.631, CFI = .932, GFI = .883, IFI = .932, RFI = .898, TLI = .919, RMSEA = .078, SRMR = .049, with all standardized factor loadings between .67 and .88. Given that GFI and RFI were marginally below .90, a theoretically justifiable modification was introduced by allowing the error terms of items 8 and 11 to covary. The revised model (illustrated in Figure 1) exhibited satisfactory fit across all indices: χ²/df = 3.97, CFI = .94, GFI = .90, IFI = .94, RFI = .91, TLI = .93, and SRMR = .046.

EFA was employed to examine the dimensional structure of the Turkish VGQ. Prior to extraction, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin index of .955 indicated excellent data suitability for this analytic approach. Bartlett’s test of sphericity was also highly significant, χ²(91) = 4090.499, p < .001, verifying that the correlation matrix deviated substantially from an identity matrix and was therefore appropriate for factor extraction. CFA was subsequently applied to test the two-factor structure that emerged from EFA. The baseline model yielded the following goodness-of-fit indices: χ²/df = 4.631, CFI = .932, GFI = .883, IFI = .932, RFI = .898, TLI = .919, RMSEA = .078, SRMR = .049, with all standardized factor loadings between .67 and .88. Given that GFI and RFI were marginally below .90, a theoretically justifiable modification was introduced by allowing the error terms of items 8 and 11 to covary. The revised model (illustrated in Figure 1) exhibited satisfactory fit across all indices: χ²/df = 3.97, CFI = .94, GFI = .90, IFI = .94, RFI = .91, TLI = .93, and SRMR = .046.